[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: finally subscribed
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 05:10:37PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> I'm not at all interested in name bickering (packages, ports, who cares ?)
>From the FreeBSD standpoint, these two mean different things. A port is
the set of Makefile,md5,COMMENT,DESCR,PLIST,patch-*. A package is the
> One question I'm pondering: is there any reason (except historical) to
> name patches, patch-aa, patch-ab... ?
No. In FreeBSD, I switched to naming mine patch-filename.ext (w/o
realizing that OpenBSD had too). I maintain way too many ports and I
was tired of having to grep the patches to figure out which patch applied
to which file.
> - to speed up make (and bsd.port.mk), with very good results. The
> infrastructure itself is about three to four times as fast as it was some
I would be *very* in interested in hearing about your make(1) and related
> I have this scheduled for OpenBSD. The main problem I see is that there
> are fairly good reasons to rewrite this in perl, which is not a problem
IMHO, you will meet with some resistance to have it written in Perl.
Many totally despise Perl. I don't know of a single Unix developer that
hates C with any where near the passion that many hate perl.
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)
To unsubscribe: send mail to <email@example.com>
with "unsubscribe bsdports" in the body of the message