[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OpenPackages comments
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
> > Second, the location where FreeBSD installs things is really lousy.
> > /usr/ports (per the above paragraph) is not a great idea; I'd prefer
> > /usr/pkg or /usr/pkgsrc per NetBSD. And /usr/opt or /usr/pkg for
> > installing things.
> Out of curiosity, why isn't /usr/local used for ports? I use /usr
> for base system hooey and /usr/local for ports.
On NetBSD, it was decided that /usr/local is left for the user to put
things in. In retrospect, using a non-standard directory has proven to be
an excellent way to find programs that don't honour any directions to
install into non-/usr/local.
Today, you can set LOCALBASE=/usr/local and get a perfectly working set of
packages in /usr/local, if you decide to do so. (Ii'm using this setup on
a machine running NetBSD/sparc).
Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
To unsubscribe: send mail to <firstname.lastname@example.org>
with "unsubscribe bsdports" in the body of the message