[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OpenPackages comments
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
> I still see a need to distinguish between packages that are provided
> by, say FreeBSD proper, and packages that are "other". The former would
> go into the base tree, and the rest into /usr/local and /usr/export (or
> whatever). /usr/local seems fine for non-OS packages.
I'd prefer to keep /usr/local for files and programs outside
of the package system - mixing package and other programs in
the same tree make it a real pain working out what is what when
you upgrade a machine.
-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --
To unsubscribe: send mail to <firstname.lastname@example.org>
with "unsubscribe bsdports" in the body of the message