[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OpenPackages comments



On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:

>   I still see a need to distinguish between packages that are provided
> by, say FreeBSD proper, and packages that are "other".  The former would
> go into the base tree, and the rest into /usr/local and /usr/export (or
> whatever).  /usr/local seems fine for non-OS packages.

	I'd prefer to keep /usr/local for files and programs outside
	of the package system - mixing package and other programs in
	the same tree make it a real pain working out what is what when
	you upgrade a machine.

		David/absolute
				       -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --




To unsubscribe: send mail to <majordomo@unixathome.org>
with "unsubscribe bsdports" in the body of the message